This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Aren’t HMRC’s examples the same?

Question:

HMRC’s Business Income manual (at BIM47825, Example 4) apportions fixed costs on the basis of business hours used as a proportion of 24 hours in a day, whereas Example 6 further down does the same apportionment using business hours as a proportion of total hours used (i.e. business plus domestic), which of course gives a much higher proportion. In both cases, the business room is also used for domestic purposes as well as business. Am I missing something here? 
 
Arthur Weller replies: 
The difference between Example 4 and Example 6 is that in Example 4 the room is available for business use for only four hours a day (i.e. between 8am and 12am), so 4/24 of the fixed costs are claimed. In Example 6, the room is available for eight hours a day (i.e. between 9am and 5pm) out of total use of the room of 10 hours a day, so 8/10 of the fixed costs are claimed. You are correct that this is a contradiction because Example 4 looks at a total of 24 hours, and Example 6 looks at the number of total hours the room is used in the day (i.e. 10 hours). 

HMRC’s Business Income manual (at BIM47825, Example 4) apportions fixed costs on the basis of business hours used as a proportion of 24 hours in a day, whereas Example 6 further down does the same apportionment using business hours as a

...


This question was first printed in Business Tax Insider in April 2020.